Effective as of June 12, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) announced several additional export control restrictions and related actions against Russia and Belarus to further degrade their ability to continue the war against Ukraine. The restrictions imposed serve as an action against those entities which have supported the Russian military industrial base and other activities contrary to U.S. national security and foreign policy interests, as well as others involved in the support of Russia’s military capabilities.
The key actions include the following:
Further Restricting Software Exports
The new BIS rule imposed additional restrictions on the export, reexport, or transfer (in country) of certain types of business software, which now includes enterprise management software and design software even if not specifically identified on the Common Control List (“CCL”). The new rule specifies that a license is required to export, reexport, or transfer to or within Russia or Belarus any EAR99-designated (general use) software including:
The license requirements also include software updates. U.S. person providers should review automatic updates to exported software to prevent deemed exports of unlicensed software. The restrictions do not apply to humanitarian efforts such as entities exclusively operating in the medical or agricultural sectors. The new rules will go into effect on September 10, 2024.
Restricting Trade in More Items Destined to Russia and Belarus
BIS has added over 500 additional Harmonized Tariff System (HTS) codes that now require a license for export, reexport, or transfer to Russia and Belarus. Those codes include license requirements for several riot control agents. Remaining trade with Russia is effectively limited to humanitarian, agricultural and medical sectors. BIS retains the right to revoke or suspend the availability of license exceptions for actors aiding in the evasion of export controls.
Reducing License Exception Eligibility for Certain Consumer Goods
BIS has narrowed the scope of License Exception Consumer Communication Devices (CCD) to exclude items such as printers, computer mice, and battery chargers.
Cracking Down on Restricted Product Diversions Through Shell Companies
BIS has created a new regulatory framework that identifies addresses on the Entity List that present a high risk of involvement in unlawful diversion. This new tool creates another barrier for shell companies to find a corporate service provider that is willing to lend the use of their address for unlawful trade. To date, BIS added eight addresses in Hong Kong to the Entity List and warned that any company that uses the addresses identified in the new rule, as a Purchaser, Intermediate Consignee, Consignee, or End-User will be faced with restrictions on their ability to engage in transactions subject to the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”). Effective immediately, the entities with the addresses listed must acquire licenses for export of all items on the CCL and Supplement No. 7 of the EAR.
Additions to the Entity List
Five entities in Russia and China are being added to the Entity List, restricting exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) involving these entities:
Temporary Denial Orders
In the new rule, BIS introduced two new Temporary Denial Orders (“TDO”) against two Russian procurement networks that it claimed were facilitating exports of aircraft parts to Russia through third countries in violation of U.S. export controls. As protective administrative measures, TDOs cut off not only the right to export items subject to the EAR from the U.S., but also the ability to receive or participate in exports from the United States or reexports of items subject to the EAR. The two TDOs include:
Restricting Distributors and Transhippers
BIS informed over 130 U.S. distributors of these new restrictions on known suppliers to Russia. Focusing on disrupting the flow of U.S. and foreign-produced electronic components to Russia through intermediaries, BIS plans more extensive targeting of foreign companies that supply U.S. restricted goods to Russia. Many non-U.S. manufacturers operate on U.S. technology, software or tooling making them subject to U.S. jurisdiction.
Conclusion
This paper is intended as a guide only and is not a substitute for specific legal or tax advice. Please reach out to the authors for any specific questions. We expect to continue to monitor the topics addressed in this paper and provide future client updates when useful.Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest to your inbox.