On December 2, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) announced two interim final rules (collectively, the “December 2024 Rules”) (“Foreign-Produced Direct Product Rule Additions, and Refinements to Controls for Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items” and “Additions and Modifications to the Entity List; Removals from the Validated End-User (VEU) Program” designed to further limit the People’s Republic of China’s (“PRC”) access to U.S. technology to further its development of advanced-node semiconductors and other technologies with significant military applications. By restricting access to U.S. tools and technologies, the BIS seeks to disrupt the PRC’s leveraging of U.S. technologies for military purposes.
Overview of the New Measures
The December 2024 Rules aim to limit the PRC’s access to critical technologies essential for advanced weapon systems, artificial intelligence (“AI”), and advanced computing. These efforts include:
Impact on the PRC’s Military-Civil Fusion Strategy
The PRC’s Military-Civil Fusion strategy presents a risk that advanced-node semiconductors and AI technologies could be repurposed for military end-uses. The December 2024 Rules build on prior BIS actions, including those in October 2022, October 2023, and April 2024, to address these threats.
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration Thea D. Rozman Kendler emphasized the importance of these measures, stating, “The purpose of these Entity List actions is to stop PRC companies from leveraging U.S. technology to indigenously produce advanced semiconductors.”
Compliance and Public Feedback
The majority of the December 2024 Rules are effective immediately. Some of the December 2024 Rules will have a delayed compliance date of December 31, 2024. BIS has invited public comments on these rules to refine and enhance these regulatory measures.
Looking Ahead
The December 2024 Rules foretell a broader U.S. strategy to adopt a “small yard, high fence” approach to protecting advanced technologies. By collaborating with allies and leveraging innovative regulatory tools, BIS aims to stay ahead of evolving threats to U.S. national security.
For exporters, understanding and adhering to these new controls is critical. Companies must closely monitor updates to the EAR and ensure robust compliance programs to address the complexities of the modern geopolitical and technological landscape.
Conclusion
This paper is intended as a guide only and is not a substitute for specific legal or tax advice. Please reach out to the authors for any specific questions. We expect to continue to monitor the topics addressed in this paper and provide future client updates when useful.
Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest to your inbox.